BT4S

BMW M4 GTS 2016

About three-fifths of your physique mass is water, the important thing to lifestyles. Scientists scour the reaches of the universe for its l...

Có thể bạn quan tâm

BMW M4 GTS 2016
9.5 trên 10 trong tổng số phiếu bầu 936 bình chọn
Hơn 1k
About three-fifths of your physique mass is water, the important thing to lifestyles. Scientists scour the reaches of the universe for its liquid form hoping that the place they to find water there could also be different existence. BMW has determined some lifestyles in water, too, squirting the stuff into the consumption plenum of the M4 GTS’s S55 twin-rapid inline six-cylinder engine to make more vigour.

It isn’t simply water injection that makes the GTS special. That is the ultra-modern in a protracted line of hopped-up M automobiles that had been not ever offered in the U.S. Earlier than now, starting with the E30 M3 Evolution and most recently the E92 M3 GTS, which packed a 4.Four-liter V-eight. Water injection isn’t a new science, even for construction automobiles. More than 50 years in the past, normal Motors provided a water-injected turbocharged engine in its 1962–sixty three Oldsmobile Jetfire. For those who never heard of that one, it’s mostly seeing that most were converted to use traditional carburetors after the secondary injector approach dried up when owners didn’t refill the tank of “rapid-Rocket” fluid, as GM referred to as its methyl-water cocktail.
Water injection is an mighty manner of cooling the consumption charge of a boosted engine. Within the short route from the air filter, via the turbos, over the dual-cam cylinder head, and through the air-to-liquid intercooler, the compressed air can reach temperatures in way over 212 levels. According to Jürgen Poggel, M GmbH’s head of engine development, injecting liquid water into the hot chamber cools the intake charge by way of about seventy seven levels in most circumstances. In probably the most extreme cases, he says, it will possibly reduce warmth to a temperate 120 or one hundred forty degrees.

Any liquid, as it transitions from a liquid state to a gaseous state, can do this magic. The evaporation method converts some of the unwanted warmness into harmless humidity. Decreasing the intake temperature prevents engine knock and the undesirable detonation of gas, and it also enables the turbos to produce more enhance—21.6 psi versus 17.2 in the normal M4—and the electronics to strengthen the timing. The outcomes in this case is a forty nine-hp bump from the 444-hp competition bundle M4, to 493 horsepower.
BMW would have injected E85 (or an alcohol-water mix like GM did) with equivalent, if now not even more elevated performance, but that, Poggel says, would trade the emissions. BMW didn’t want an engine that would ever be out of tailpipe compliance if the secondary tank ran dry, like a diesel running without urea. (We’re curious to peer what tuners similar to Dinan might provide you with.) additional water vapor in the combustion chamber does nothing to emissions considering that there is nothing combustible in distilled water. Run the water tank dry and the engine reverts to 444-hp tune. On a racetrack, the 1.Three-gallon tank under the trunk ground will empty at roughly the identical expense as the 15.9-gallon fuel tank. Water injection is energetic most effective above 5000 rpm and below full load, so avenue drivers will need to rehydrate less mostly, probably every fifth or sixth gas fill-up, depending on driving sort. It is unclear if dealerships will quickly stock distilled “manufacturing facility-spec” water with a BMW phase number.

To curb the risk of corrosion and to hinder water from freezing, the water strains are drained each time the engine shuts down. The procedure primes within seconds upon startup, well earlier than the driving force will have to be calling for 5000 rpm underneath full load on a bloodless engine.
By using this point, you’ve probably glanced at the requisites, obvious the six-determine price tag, and questioned, “What the hell, for an M4?” even as the fundamental shell of the M4 is unchanged, BMW swapped out many components in pursuit of monitor performance, highly-priced bits that push the cost to twice that of the base M4.
Carbon-ceramic brake rotors; a carbon-fiber hood, roof, strut brace, driveshaft, rear wing, front splitter, and rear bulkhead; and lightweight interior trim borrowed from the i3, are typical and curb weight. These help offset the 22 pounds of mass introduced for the water-injection system. All of the GTS automobiles for the U.S. Include an orange-painted, 4-point roll cage in location of the traditional back seat. U.S.-spec cars received’t have the extremely-light-weight carbon-fiber seats obvious in these images; as an alternative we’ll get a lighter-than-ordinary activity seat with handbook changes. The outcome is a car that weighs about the equal as a typical M4 geared up with the dual-grab automatic transmission (the one gearbox for the GTS), or 3550 kilos.

There’s extra magic within the chassis. BMW selected meaty Michelin Pilot recreation Cup 2 tires, 265/35ZR-19 up entrance and 285/30ZR-20 in again, to wrangle the gut-punch torque and the rest of the chassis changes in step. The basic suspension setup, struts in front with a rigidly hooked up rear subframe carrying a multilink suspension and an electronically controlled limited-slip differential in back, remains, however three-means adjustable dampers with outside reservoirs and adjustable spring perches (they can decrease the auto by means of zero.8 inch for track duty) are employed right here. The extra grip of the Cup 2s additionally required a change to the engine: The sump carries an extra quart of motor oil to prevent oil starvation in high-g maneuvers.
With the additional power and grip, we count on the GTS to run the quarter-mile in eleven.5 seconds. Drivers are likely to do a lot of these sprints simply to hear the engine at full tilt, when you consider that it seems like a feral beast. BMW cites 493 horsepower and 443 lb-toes of twist, nevertheless it feels extra like 550 of every. And purists, have fun! No synthetic soundtrack pumps by way of the audio system right here. All sounds are 100-percentage pure inline-six.

We most effective sampled the vehicle on a racetrack, with the suspension decreased thus, and might say that the GTS makes your normal vehicle believe like overcooked pasta in evaluation. Flat-foot the fuel on nook exit and the tail drifts only a bit in a predictable, manageable way. The GTS is as professional a monitor automobile as any GT Porsche, Camaro Z/28, or Mustang Shelby GT350R. Looking for proof? Assess out the video under, which suggests the GTS strolling a 7:27.9 lap of the Nürburgring Nordschleife, faster than that of a Ferrari 458 Italia.

The Cup 2s help liven up the M4 steerage with authentic suggestions coming by means of the suede-wrapped steering wheel, anything lacking within the present iteration of M3/M4. We’d decide on a better brake pedal, or just a little extra spacing between the brake and throttle pedals, to make left-foot braking less complicated. BMW claims the aero package deal, with the front splitter manually expanded 2.Four inches to its track position and the rear wing in the most aggressive angle of three, generates 63 kilos of downforce on the entrance axle and 210 on the rear at 186 mph.

With a limited run of seven hundred GTSs worldwide and 300 canine-eared for the us, this designated M4 can also be exclusive. BMW says its purchasers have already spoken for the entire cars and that customer vetting has begun. The automaker has no worries about its ability to sell every M4 GTS and expects most to be used as they were supposed, as dedicated monitor cars that don’t have got to be trailered to the paddock.

2017 Ferrari California T Handling Speciale

Including the word “particular” in Italian to the name of a auto conjures up all sorts of motoring lore and mainly provides a bunch of zeros...

Có thể bạn quan tâm

2017 Ferrari California T Handling Speciale
9.5 trên 10 trong tổng số phiếu bầu 936 bình chọn
Hơn 1k

Including the word “particular” in Italian to the name of a auto conjures up all sorts of motoring lore and mainly provides a bunch of zeros to its eventual public sale value as a collectible. As if each Ferrari weren’t speciale, the company has pasted the label on an extended and wonderful line of cars, from the 1962 250GT SWB Berlinetta Speciale (the one one bought final 12 months for $16.5 million) to the contemporary 458 Speciale. Each and every Speciale is, er, precise in its own manner, despite the fact that Ferrari is just not above utilizing the term on relatively much less-ambitious initiatives. The brand new California T handling Speciale, for illustration, is truly a Cal T with a exercises suspension. BMW guys may just feel of it as the identical of an M sport variant while these with a bent towards American iron may draw parallels to a Chevy Impala SS.

The first-gen California (2009–2014) delivered the package in 2012 to sharpen up each the performance and image of Ferrari’s entry-degree roadster. Which, not to put too satisfactory a factor on it, suffered from somewhat of a teddy-endure status. Ferrari says the package deal ultimately discovered its manner onto 20 percent of Californias and was once excellent for luring performance-minded buyers out of less-highly-priced however more difficult-core automobiles such because the Porsche 911 and various Mercedes-AMG Black sequence units. The California is a pathway into the Ferrari company, with half of them sold to consumers who're new to the marque.


The handling Speciale now returns to the California T, which used to be restyled for 2015 and re-armed with a new 552-hp 3.9-liter twin-faster V-8, just right for smashing zero to 60 mph in 3.3 seconds. The brand new California T is a exotic development—better looking, extra high-priced, quicker, and usable as a day-to-day driver. The HS package deal is just a slight toning. For $8120, chump change in Ferrari-land, it turns up the suspension stiffness a click on or two, hastens the shifts quite, adds a few styling tweaks, and opens up the exhaust to give more sound if not more vigor.

That is ordinary performance-bundle stuff, accomplished by way of each car manufacturer to increase appeal without breaking the financial institution, either from a cost or cost standpoint. The spring premiums upward thrust a mere sixteen percentage in entrance and 19 percentage in back, with a revised tune to the MagneRide variable dampers to leverage the tautened hardware. In addition, an altered gearbox map cuts the upshift time by using 30 percent and the downshift time by means of 40 percentage, whilst the F1-Trac traction manipulate’s sport mode is also massaged for more digging when exiting a corner and higher power delivery over rough pavement.

In back, the regular mufflers are replaced with straight-by way of pipes hooked up to a Helmholtz resonator, an acoustical box that diminishes undesirable noise while serving to to shape the outgoing harmonic frequencies. The outcomes is a sharper roar, an natural of three decibels louder throughout the rev range. Inside of, there’s a dash plaque, while on the outside the grille and rear cut back valence are rendered in accent-colour grey to provide the car a extra purposeful appearance.


Since the massaging is so mild and the underlying car is so excellent, there are virtually no faults to be found within the HS. It behaves like a California T that received nine rather of seven hours of sleep final night. It’s just a bit more alert, just a little extra keen to corner, and a little lustier in its engine cry. The chic stability in even this most cost-effective model (base cost: $202,723 earlier than Speciale package deal) will floor individuals who’ve certainly not driven a Ferrari. Few automobiles are as fluid in movement, from the flawlessly weighted steering to the precisely calibrated brakes to the seamlessly shifted transmission. Ferraris weren’t always this subtle, so the factory deserves credit for making high-quality strides.

Distinct kudos go to the engineers who sorted the turbocharging. The Cal T has no lifeless spots or lumpiness in its torque delivery. The driving force on no account gets an additional nor one less pound-foot than what was requested via the pedal, which makes for extraordinary self assurance when rocketing into a twisty part. This isn't a auto with a view to run away on an avalanche of enhance or collapse useless when the motive force lifts. Its responses are as close to those of a naturally aspirated engine as a faster will get.

Yeah, it’s hackneyed to assert that a Ferrari is quality, but this one relatively is, whether it’s in HS or common grade. The one thing the Speciale package deal doesn’t do is repair the automobile’s proportions, which are a number of too many cannoli this part of attractive. It has just a little too much entrance overhang and somewhat too much bodywork above the wheel arches, primarily in again. You must stroll earlier a number of prettier and less-pricey convertibles to pick this one, the Aston Martin Vantage among them, but the California T grabs and holds you with its dynamic perfection. The HS bundle is only a high-quality little cherry on top.

2017 Ferrari GTC4Lusso Revealed!

When Ferrari’s FF made its debut for 2012, the model broke new ground by being the first Ferrari with four-wheel drive. (The four-wheel-driv...

Có thể bạn quan tâm

2017 Ferrari GTC4Lusso Revealed!
9.5 trên 10 trong tổng số phiếu bầu 936 bình chọn
Hơn 1k
When Ferrari’s FF made its debut for 2012, the model broke new ground by being the first Ferrari with four-wheel drive. (The four-wheel-drive system and the car’s four-place layout led to the “FF” designation.) The newly unveiled follow-up version adds four-wheel steering to the mix, but rather than adding a third “F” to the model name, Ferrari switched to the more evocative GTC4Lusso.
Like the FF, the GTC4Lusso is a long-roof hatchback—a “shooting brake,” in European parlance—that allows it to seat four and carry a reasonable amount of luggage. The model’s all-weather capability and seating for more than two gives it a practical nature (Ferrari points out that FF owners log 30 percent more miles than the typical Ferrari driver). The GTC4Lusso retains its position as Ferrari’s practical supercar—although it nudges things a bit more toward the “supercar” side of the house.
The styling features a sleeker roofline and a restyled rear area that tones down the FF’s hatchback look. The greatest dimensional change is in width (which grows by 1.1 inches), and that difference is most evident in the rear view, which also shows the new roof spoiler and rear diffuser. Overall length and height, by contrast, both increase by less than an inch. The GTC4Lusso sports re-sculpted doors and fenders, the latter with redesigned (and functional) air vents. Up front we find a wider grille and restyled headlamps. The leather-everywhere interior retains its digital readouts for rpm and speed on the passenger side but gains a larger, 10.3-inch infotainment screen with capacitive-touch controls and a redesigned, smaller steering wheel.
The big mechanical highlight is the addition of four-wheel steering (seen before on the F12tdf but never previously married with AWD—at least not at Ferrari). As any self-respecting new Ferrari must, the GTC4Lusso also ups the performance quotient. Ferrari has lured a few more horses into its (still naturally aspirated) V-12 corral. A higher compression ratio—now 13.5:1—sees increases in output to 681 horsepower, up from 651, at a lusty 8000 rpm. Torque swells from 504 to 514 lb-ft at 5750 rpm. Ferrari claims a zero-to-62-mph time of 3.4 seconds and a top speed of 208 mph.
The GTC4Lusso will make its debut in person next month at the Geneva auto show. We won’t see the GTC4Lusso on the streets here in North America until sometime later this year. The price? Ferrari isn’t saying just yet, but don’t expect to pay any less than $302,450—that was the tariff for the FF, and we’ve never known a new Ferrari that was cheaper than the previous model.

2017 Ferrari GTC4Lusso

That  the 2017 Ferrari GTC4Lusso  is at least one second faster around Ferrari’s Fiorano test track than the wagonoid FF that it replaces is...

Có thể bạn quan tâm

2017 Ferrari GTC4Lusso
9.5 trên 10 trong tổng số phiếu bầu 936 bình chọn
Hơn 1k
That the 2017 Ferrari GTC4Lusso is at least one second faster around Ferrari’s Fiorano test track than the wagonoid FF that it replaces is meaningless. Partly, this is because it’s essentially an update on the same car. But it’s also because, according to Stefano Varisco, the man responsible for the Lusso’s vehicle dynamics, improving lap times wasn’t a target for the Lusso development team. More to the point, the all-wheel-drive Lusso is clearly a GT car, a machine made for triple-digit sweepers and deserted highways more than for Alpine switchbacks. Hot laps? They’re in the Lusso’s purview but certainly not in its crosshairs.
So it matters little when we find ourselves in a parade of tour buses, cyclists, and even sport bikes operating with a churlish disregard for velocity while climbing switchback roads in the Italian Alps. That a Ferrari should be so disrespected on its own turf is astonishing. That this indifference is demonstrated mostly by Germans on holiday is not. Possibly the drive route was chosen by Ferrari in a veiled attempt to highlight the Lusso’s greatest virtue: utter civility.
Ferraris, after all, are universally wedded to the expectation of noise: soul-scorching symphonic theater. A 680-horsepower V-12-powered Ferrari lacking such theater is as contradictory as a black fire truck. Should the Lusso’s double-pane windows, quieter exhaust, and extra sound deadening still wave the prancing-horse flag? Can an old man’s Ferrari still be a Ferrari? More philosophically, should it be? The collective heart of the tifosi just skipped a beat.

Drives Like a Ferrari

Still, it works. The Lusso doesn’t make itself small on these roads. It just swallows them whole. There’s nothing subtle here, but there is a calm confidence about its abilities. Utterly stuck to the ground, the front tires follow every command from the lightly weighted steering wheel, and, in turn, the rest of the big coupe obeys. Don’t think you’re going to slide this car; it’s not that kind of machine. It almost never overburdens its front tires, but neither does it want to power out sideways. If there’s oversteer to be had, even at low speed, it demands the kind of inputs that often result in regret.
The V-12 delivers. Although it doesn’t detonate the 2.1-ton Lusso out of slow corners the way that, say, a Nissan GT-R’s twin-turbo six does, it pays off in an 8250-rpm swell that makes engines with half the cylinders feel like playthings. Shifting the seven-speed dual-clutch automatic at speed is hampered only by an infrequent need to find the column-fixed shift paddles. It is a wildly flexible thing, this engine.
But the Lusso is not perfect. Its transmission vacillates counterintuitively in low-speed maneuvers where precision is most required. The steering effort is so light that guiding it prudently can be challenging. And it’s quieter than the FF, especially at idle. Its exhaust is intentionally hushed, which Ferrari says is to better suit owners who will drive these cars daily.
Still, three hours later, after showing its taillights to every Iveco truck in the Alps, we realize the truth about the Lusso is evident: Ferrari has created the world’s best answer to the Porsche Panamera. But forget Germanic stoicism; this four-seat, all-wheel-drive hatchback is dripping with Italian flourish. Yes, it has two fewer doors than a Panamera. So what? If you’re really concerned about hauling four people, buy a Mercedes-Benz S-class. All hips and haunches, the GTC4Lusso is also approximately 100 percent easier on the eyes. And, yes, it’s quiet, except at full throttle. Then it’s Monza in September. And it’s fast.

Just a Revised FF?

Which brings us to the point: The GTC4Lusso is Ferrari’s replacement for its FF, a Ferrari whose identity was always in question, torn between pragmatism and passion. The Lusso fares better on style alone, with more aggressive rear fenders, sculpted sides, and a larger grille. Dimensionally, the two are virtually identical, both riding a 117.7-inch wheelbase, which is 1.6 inches longer than that of the recently revealed second-generation Porsche sedan.
The Lusso’s V-12 gets a higher compression ratio from redesigned pistons. Coupled with equal-length six-into-one exhaust manifolds, the engine tweaks yield an additional 29 horsepower and 10 lb-ft of torque over the FF. The dual-clutch transaxle is unchanged and houses an electronically controlled clutch-type limited-slip differential.
Although it’s made up largely of the same hardware as the FF, the GTC4Lusso’s crux move is its unusual all-wheel-drive system, which uses a two-speed gearbox driven directly by the nose of the crankshaft. The two-speed’s range is sufficient to cover the rear transaxle’s first four gears. In fifth through seventh gears, the Lusso is a rear-wheel-driver. Clutches on each front half-shaft allow torque vectoring to each front wheel. A more efficient heat exchanger with increased thermal capacity enables the delivery of more torque to the front wheels in dry conditions.

New Hardware Inside and Out

Rear-wheel steering is new to the Lusso. First introduced on the F12tdf, the system’s response depends on a number of variables, but most of the time it steers the rear tires in the same direction as the fronts. This strategy gives the driver more confidence by providing consistent feedback, according to Varisco. Out-of-phase rear steering, the kind that crabs the rear around corners, is reserved only for turn-in and limited to about 0.1 second per use to initiate car rotation.
Inside, the Lusso has gone full Formula 1, with virtually every secondary control mounted on the steering wheel. That includes the ignition, the headlights, the turn signals, the windshield wipers, the manettino performance-mode dial, and the phone controls. There are roller switches on the back of the spokes controlling audio volume and instrument-panel configuration. And, in a nod to the reality of rough roads, there’s a button that temporarily softens the magnetorheological dampers without requiring the driver to switch out of Sport mode.
The infotainment is upgraded with an all-new 10.3-inch touchscreen accompanied by a dedicated knob-and-button interface. Combined, these make quick work of audio, phone, and ventilation needs. The system is fast and intuitive and has usable controls—a rare trifecta, particularly among low-volume carmakers.
The interior impresses, but no more than that of a Porsche at half the price. Stitched leather is everywhere. The round air vents are an awesome marriage of function and style. But the feckless flat-bottom steering wheel would seem out of place in any road car. The rear seats are usable if the fronts aren’t occupied by someone taller than six feet, but the back isn’t a place you’ll find adults volunteering to ride—at least, not those who’ve already experienced a V-12 Ferrari.
The GTC4Lusso will cost about $300,000 when it hits U.S. showrooms later this year. It’s likely the most usable and civilized road car the company has ever made. But has its decency made it less virile? Less of a Ferrari? The answer comes as we switch off stability control, open the throttle, and bathe the Dolomites with the V-12’s glory call. No, this is still a Ferrari. And it is a good one.

Ferrari LaFerrari Tested: Yes, It's Hellaciously Quick

To test  the Ferrari LaFerrari , we traveled to Italy to the storied marque’s personal track, Fiorano. Ferrari’s offer was this: We could ei...

Có thể bạn quan tâm

Ferrari LaFerrari Tested: Yes, It's Hellaciously Quick
9.5 trên 10 trong tổng số phiếu bầu 936 bình chọn
Hơn 1k
To test the Ferrari LaFerrari, we traveled to Italy to the storied marque’s personal track, Fiorano. Ferrari’s offer was this: We could either test there—or not at all. We chose to test.
The Fiorano circuit is nearly two miles long, a thirteen-turn rollercoaster built on what was once Italian farmland. Our usual testing venues, where we gather our zero-to-60-mph times, quarter-mile acceleration, braking figures, and grip numbers are nothing like racetracks. Putting a car through our battery of tests calls for a long, flat straight, usually one more than a mile in length, as well as a 300-foot skidpad to assess lateral acceleration.
But even when we test at our locations, Ferrari doesn’t just let us jump into its cars and test them. An engineer watches the proceedings and provides an often-valuable briefing on the subsystems of the car, and mechanics are there to swap out tires if necessary. When asked why all the bother, Ferrari says it wants the test to go smoothly and being there ensures that any problems that arise can be hammered out that day. Every modern Ferrari we’ve tested with the factory’s knowledge also had the automaker’s own test equipment inside the car to record what we’re doing and, as they tell us, as a backup should our own test equipment fail. We find this “generosity” completely unnecessary, however, and, aside from a recent McLaren 650S test, no other manufacturer proctors our normal battery of tests, and we test more than 200 cars per year.

The Results: Apply an Asterisk as You Deem Fit

0 to 60 mph: 2.5 sec

0 to 100 mph: 4.8 sec

0 to 150 mph: 9.8 sec
Standing ¼-mile: 9.8 sec @ 150 mph

Full disclosure: The Fiorano track introduces major limitations to our usual testing procedures. The straight has a slight kink in it as you pass under a bridge, and there’s not much space to accelerate beyond the quarter-mile. C/D procedure calls for running in two directions to offset any potential elevation changes and the effects of wind. Fiorano’s straight is ever so slightly downhill, but at least there was little to no wind on our test day. Ordinarily, we’d either reject the testing venue or we’d run in both directions and average the results. Running the straight in two directions is impossible, according to Ferrari, and reversing the FIA-approved racetrack would apparently poke the bureaucratic monster that rules over Italy. Or we might hit the bridge. Either way, that wasn’t happening. So we were unable to average our best runs in each direction and have to use the best in one direction here. The results, we must note, are uncorrected for ambient conditions, meaning they’re representative of what the LaFerrari did on this particular day. It’s the same policy we applied to our 2003 test of the Enzo, and, in any event, the weather correction wouldn’t have affected the LaFerrari numbers much at all.
That’s it with the caveats—apply an asterisk as you deem fit—but at Fiorano the LaFerrari produced the quickest acceleration to 150 mph of any production car we’ve ever tested. To 150 mph, the LaFerrari is a full 1.5 seconds quicker than the early Bugatti Veyron 16.4 we tested in 2008. Put up against the Porsche 918 Spyder, the LaFerrari traverses the quarter-mile in the same 9.8 seconds, but the Ferrari is going 150 mph at the traps versus the 918’s 145.
Making the performance even more remarkable is that the LaFerrari is rear-wheel drive. Ferrari’s launch control is easy to actuate and rips off consistent runs, but the 918’s four-wheel drive gives it an initial advantage. So the LaFerrari’s 2.5-second 0-to-60 romp can’t match the Porsche’s 2.2-second time to 60 mph. Initial traction gets the 918 to 60 in 114 feet; the LaFerrari needs 119. Still, the LaFerrari is pushing on your chest with a full g of force through 70 mph and it doesn’t taper off much after that. In the rolling 5-to-60-mph test, which removes the aggressive launch, the LaFerrari posted a 3.0-second time.
Beyond 60 mph, the 3489-pound LaFerrari’s superior power-to-weight ratio allows it to begin to pull away from the 3724-pound 918. The Ferrari’s combined 950 horsepower yields a 3.7-pound-per-horsepower ratio; each of the 918’s horses moves 4.2 pounds. In the Ferrari, the century mark passes in a what-the-hell-was-that 4.8 seconds—one-tenth quicker than the 918. And there’s the aforementioned advantage to 150. At one of our normal testing venues, we could have pushed well past 150 mph, but at Fiorano we had to be hard on the brakes a blink after the speedometer indicated that speed.
At least the LaFerrari’s braking numbers don’t require any hemming or hawing. There’s enough of a flat and even surface before Turn Twelve to perform our 70-to-0-mph test. Stops from 70 took only 136 feet, and the LaFerrari hooks to the ground as if it stubbed its toe. Regenerative braking can erase up to 0.4 g of braking force, but the big carbon-ceramic rotors are the main retardants. Stops are repeatable and incredibly stable due to the dynamic aero that flips up the air brakes under severe deceleration. Pirelli P Zero Corsa tires developed for the LaFerrari are the only rubber available. When asked if Pirelli’s stickier Trofeo R rubber was considered, an engineer quipped, “Our owners might have to drive home in the rain.” A clear criticism of the slick tires that General Motors puts on the Camaro Z/28, and not the first time Ferrari personnel commented to us on the Z/28’s rubber. We’ve driven the Z/28 in the rain, though, and it’s not impossible. Which leaves us dreaming of a LaFerrari on Trofeo Rs.
Fiorano might not be ideal for our normal tests, but it is a racetrack. After straight-line testing in the morning and a pasta-filled lunch, we spent the afternoon hammering the LaFerrari at a place where Villeneuve, Schumacher, Ickx, Lauda, and Prost lapped. Our guide is Ferrari’s test driver Raffaele de Simone, who can hustle the LaFerrari around Fiorano in 1 minute, 20 seconds. His on-track orientation for us lasts all of 1:21.50 seconds. Our best lap is a less-impressive 1:23.39.

Numbers Are Far from the Whole Story

You now know what the LaFerrari did to the test equipment, but the numbers don’t reveal what the car did to us. De Simone claims that a major goal in the development of the LaFerrari was to make the limit accessible. “We could’ve made a race car, but only a race car driver could enjoy it.”
Instead it’s a $1.4-million hypercar with the soul of a racing go-kart, one that mixes huge lateral grip with the ability to slide the car. Like a racing kart, small slips and slides happen in the LaFerrari and none of them feel lethal or surprising. There’s no snapping, no unsettling events, no twitchiness. The limit isn’t a cliff, but rather a very steep ramp. Approaching the limit calls for Adderall levels of attention, but going off the edge doesn’t necessarily mean a fall. Even the seating position is go-kart-like, with the seat set low and the backrest laid back. What’s astonishing is that a car as quick as the LaFerrari can be playful and forgiving—it’s not exactly a puppy dog, though. Let’s go with bear cub.
Driver confidence comes fast despite the ridiculous performance. But confidence, whether in a Greek tragedy or at the track, is a catalyst for mistakes. On our first quick lap, we enter Fiorano’s seventh corner, a long sweeping left-hander at a hubris-filled 117 mph. Just as we realize that we’re not de Simone, the 345/30R-20 tires in back start coming around. Major questions that immediately arose: What is there to hit here? When will this stop? What sort of nickname will this earn us?And then, Whoa, it’s back. Control is regained—hubris, schmubris.
Our savior is the LaFerrari’s chassis. Mounting the batteries as low as possible gives an impossibly low center of gravity that’s 1.4 inches superior to the Enzo’s. And there’s also the surprisingly light and quick steering (1.8 turns lock-to-lock). It’s as if the car has the perfect caffeine buzz—the LaFerrari is never nervous, just alert and ready. How important is the center of gravity? Ferrari presented a graph of the relationship between the height of the center of gravity (CG) and the horsepower required to compensate for a higher CG. A 1.2-inch drop in CG has the same effect on Fiorano lap times as adding 50 horsepower. The message from an Italian power broker? Power actually isn’t everything.
Power, however, counts. And the LaFerrari has plenty of it—like, African dictator levels, which come courtesy of a 6.3-liter V-12 and a 161-hp electric motor. The primary difference between the V-12 here and in the F12berlinetta is the LaFerrari’s continuously adjusting intake runners that constantly alter intake-tract length. The rev cut comes in at 9250 rpm, while the redline on the digital tach appears at 9000 rpm. The gas-burning engine makes 789 horsepower and 516 lb-ft of torque on its own. It’s smooth and it hums at low rpm, but opening the throttle sends it zinging like a sport-bike engine and triggers an adrenaline rush. It’s a race-car sort of sound and there’s absolutely no electronic auto-tuning going on—what you hear is the live performance of a short-stroke V-12. Facsimiles of this V-12’s audio could probably be digitized and played through the speakers of lesser cars.
The quiet sidekick to the superhero V-12 is that electric motor. Electric motors aren’t sexy and this one stays in the background, quietly fattening the torque curve and improving fuel economy. The integration of the electric motor is so subtle and the flow of electrons from the 2.2-kWh lithium-ion battery pack so graceful that you don’t notice the second source of power, and it simply makes the V-12 feel like the most amazing naturally aspirated engine you’ve ever laid into. For example, to make the V-12 more responsive, the electric motor can work against and strain the V-12 in certain cruising conditions. Hit the accelerator and the motor releases its hold on the V-12 and the engine spins like the flywheel just disappeared; the word “zing” isn’t zingy enough to describe the feeling. This strategy may be responsible for the quickest-ever passing times we’ve recorded. Going from 30 to 50 mph requires 1.5 seconds, from 50 to 70 just 1.6.
In addition to carbon-ceramic rotors, the LaFerrari decelerates with the help of air brakes and the electric motor. Heavy regenerative braking takes some load off the discs and the air brake adds drag and downforce and stabilizes the car. Braking hard requires a lot of pedal pressure and the ABS comes in shockingly late. We kept braking later and later on track and there wasn’t even a hint of fade or any change in the brake pedal’s firm resistance.
A second here and a second there eventually add up to a day with the LaFerrari, which leaves us feeling it’s the most joyous hypercar. It will make you feel like a hero as you slide it around, while also requiring patience on corner exit or you’ll start drifting. Next to the 918, the Ferrari comes off as mischievous and willing to play, as the Porsche’s four-wheel-drive setup takes some of the spirit and challenge out of lapping it. If we had to guess, the 918’s record time at our Lightning Lap competition at VIR might not fall to the LaFerrari, but the latter car would be more involving and more fun. Perhaps someday Ferrari will let us whip the LaFerrari around VIR and we can find out once and for all. We won’t even mind if they watch.

Mitsubishi Mirage ES 2014

Way back in 1989, Mitsubishi scored a 10Best win with its Mirage Turbo. That delightful little compact led its class in refinement, performa...

Có thể bạn quan tâm

Mitsubishi Mirage ES 2014
9.5 trên 10 trong tổng số phiếu bầu 936 bình chọn
Hơn 1k
Way back in 1989, Mitsubishi scored a 10Best win with its Mirage Turbo. That delightful little compact led its class in refinement, performance, and design. Fast-forward 25 years to the 2014 Mitsubishi Mirage and it looks like things have gone backward—fast.
If the new Mirage were sent back a quarter century, it probably couldn’t return with a 10Best trophy unless it wrestled one away from the old Mirage and raced back into the time machine. But with 74 horsepower, the new Mirage isn’t racing anywhere. Floor it, something you’ll find yourself doing a lot, and the 77 decibels of ringing three-cylinder grittiness will make you wonder if there’s actually a leaf blower under the hood.
Even when idling, the little 1.2-liter sends quivers through the entire car. And should you opt for the CVT, the trio of cylinders will grumble in protest every time you try to accelerate. And by acceleration, we’re talking about a zero-to-60 time of 10.9 seconds and a quarter-mile time of 18.3 seconds at 75 mph. This is from the Evo company?
Small-car shoppers likely will be more interested in the Mirage’s 37-mpg city/44-mpg highway fuel efficiency. We couldn’t verify those numbers, though; we managed an unimpressive 26 mpg, mostly because we found ourselves using every bit of the 1.2’s power just to keep from being run over by pelotons of shouting cyclists.
Using 100 percent of a car’s capabilities can be entertaining, even if the car itself isn’t very capable. And the Mirage is one of those rare cars that makes speed limits seem reasonable. Velocity takes patience, passes take serious planning, and you’ll want to maintain every possible mile per hour through corners by exploiting the 0.74 g of grip from the slight 165/65R-14 Dunlops.
We do like the tossable, non-threatening nature of the Mirage when you hustle it. It only weighs 2066 pounds, or 15 more than a Lotus Elise SC. But that’s hardly enough to make up for the weak and noisy engine. There’s so little fat on the Mirage that you’ll feel close to the vibrations and sounds of machinery. That lack of refinement gets old, though. And light weight and a 59.1-inch height mean that on the highway, you’re the leaf, not the blower.
We realize that this vehicle is intended as basic transportation, but that’s no excuse for looking like a Chinese copy of an old Toyota Yaris. It doesn’t cost a carmaker any more money to build an attractive or modern-looking car, so why does the Mirage look as if it’s two decades old?
Things improve inside. A touch of piano black on the center console dresses up the pleasant but generic interior. You’ll soon notice, however, that there’s no center armrest and that every last piece of plastic is hard. The front seats are spacious, but the absence of a telescoping steering wheel makes for a compromised driving position. Rear-seat space is tight, even if large doors make getting in and out easy.
Base manual versions start at $13,790, and our ES trim–level Mirage came loaded with navigation and automatic climate control for $16,890. That’s a first-world price for a car that behaves like something you’d rent on vacation in Guatemala. For that money you can buy a Hyundai Accent, a Kia Rio, a Mazda 2, a Toyota Yaris, or even a Nissan Versa.
Granted, those cars won’t have navigation and automatic climate control for $17,000, but they are all more refined, powerful, and satisfying to live with than the Mirage. And while the Mirage is amusing in a they-sure-don’t-make-them-like-this-anymore way, so is a Commodore 64. Small-car customers are looking for the best vehicle they can get on a budget, not an anachronism.
BT4S